Related StoriesResearchers reveal how charged gold nanoparticles influence framework of DNA and RNAComputerised cognitive behavioural therapy apt to be ineffective in despair treatmentStudy discovers high prevalence of dehydration in older people living in UK care homesCaregivers who was simply abused as kids showed higher degrees of TNF than non-abused caregivers or handles, whether they had been abused or not really. Individuals who faced adverse encounters as kids showed no significant increase in TNF amounts this past due stage of life, the study showed. As might be expected, participants who reported becoming abused showed greater degrees of depression than those that weren’t.Having authors suggest the very best reviewers may therefore look like a good idea. In the aftermath of the latest scandals involving fake peer reviewers, many journals are determined to turn off the reviewer-recommendation option on their manuscript-submission systems. But that move is probably not enough, as the publisher Hindawi discovered this past spring. Although Hindawi doesn’t allow authors recommend reviewers because of their manuscripts, it made a decision to examine the peer-review records for manuscripts submitted in 2013 and 2014 for possible fraud. The peer-review procedure found in Hindawi’s journals depends mainly on the expertise of its editorial board members and the guest editors of special issues, who are in charge of supervising the review of submitted manuscripts.5 Because the peer reviewers chosen by the guest editors weren’t subject to any kind of independent verification, editors themselves could undermine the process in quite similar way that authors or third-party agencies have done elsewhere: by creating false reviewer identities and addresses from which they submitted positive reviews endorsing publication.